Chat with over a million Supreme Court and 25 High Court judgments. Every answer is backed by verifiable verdicts—fast, accurate, and hallucination-free.
5 free queries a day·no credit card·built for litigators, researchers & students
Today on the Bench
Supreme Court of India · 5-Judge Constitution Bench
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
(1980) 2 SCC 565·
“The power exercisable under Section 438 is somewhat extraordinary in character and is to be invoked in exceptional cases where it appears that the person may be falsely implicated, or a frivolous case may be launched against him, or there are reasonable grounds for holding that a person accused of an offence is not likely to otherwise misuse his liberty.”
The same answer format you'll see inside DigiLaw.ai — a summary up top, verbatim holdings below, and every claim linked to the source it came from. Click a citation marker to open the source.
Is anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC available for offences under the SC/ST Act?
AIGrounded · 3 sources
Summary
The bar in Section 18 of the SC/ST Act on anticipatory bail is constitutionally valid . But where the FIR does not, on its face, disclose a prima facie offence under the Act, Section 438 CrPC remains available .
Issue
Whether anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is available where the offence is alleged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Rule
Section 18 of the SC/ST Act creates an absolute bar on anticipatory bail. The Supreme Court has held this bar is constitutionally valid . The exception, recognised in Vilas Pandurang Pawar, is that Section 18 only operates where a prima facie offence under the Act is disclosed on the face of the complaint or FIR .
“
The scope of enquiry under Section 18 is limited to whether on the face of it the allegations make out a prima facie case for offences under the Act. Where the allegations on the face are absurd or do not disclose such an offence, the bar of Section 18 will not apply.
Application
High Courts have applied this reasoning to deny anticipatory bail where the FIR discloses prima facie atrocity, while granting it where the allegations are general or where the "in any place within public view" requirement is not met .
Conclusion
Anticipatory bail is barred under Section 18 SC/ST Act unless the FIR fails to disclose a prima facie offence under the Act, in which case the protection of Section 438 CrPC is available.
Why grounded matters
The difference is the citation.
Most legal AI will confidently cite a case that was never decided. DigiLaw.ai answers only from real judgments — and links every claim to the page it came from, so you can read it, quote it, and stand behind it in court.
Retrieval before generation — the model only sees real passages.
Every citation verified against its source chunk after drafting.
One click opens the original PDF on the court record.
Generic AI
“Anticipatory bail is governed by Sharma v. Union of India (2019) 4 SCC 211…”
Citation not found — case does not exist
DigiLaw.ai
“Anticipatory bail under Section 438 is extraordinary in character[Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab]…”
Verified · (1980) 2 SCC 565 · opens original PDF
How it works
Ask first. Analyze deeply. Verify always.
Step 01
01
Ask
Pose a question in plain language, or follow up on the last answer — the conversation keeps its context.
Step 02
02
Analyze
DigiLaw.ai weighs the most relevant passages across a million-plus judgments before a single word is drafted.
Step 03
03
Verify
The answer is grounded in those passages, and every citation is checked against its source before you see it.
FAQ
Start your research
Ask your first question free.
Five grounded answers a day, every citation linked to its source. No credit card, cancel any time.