JUDGMENT 1. This rule was issued to shew cause why the order of the Deputy Magistrate of the 21st January 1902 directing the Petitioners to give security for keeping the peace should not be set aside, on the ground that the facts upon which the order is based do not justify such order with reference to the provisions of sec. 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. No one appears to shew cause, and we do no find that any cause has been shown by latter. 2. In order to justify an order under sec. 118 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requiring security for keeping the peace, it is necessary that the order should show that the person so called upon is likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquility or to do some wrongful act that may probably occasion a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquility. As far as we can understand from the order made by the Deputy Magistrate the persons who have been bound over are found to have used their influence for the purpose of stopping the services of the village barber, washerman and others from being rendered to the complainant. No other act is stated, but it is said generally that they have committed "diverse other acts of oppression." 3. We think that that is not enough to justify an order requiring security. It is not shown in what way the stopping of the services of the barber and washerman would bring the case within the provisions of sec. 107, and the statement that "diverse other acts of oppression" had been committed is too vague to sustain the order. 4. We accordingly make the rule absolute, and set aside the order of the Deputy Magistrate. This order will not prevent the Deputy Magistrate from taking steps according to law on information of facts which would justify his proceeding under sec. 107.