JUDGMENT Stevens and Harington, JJ. - This Rule was issued to show cause why the order purporting to have been made under the provisions of Section 146 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with reference to certain crops which had been cut and stored on the threshing-floor should not be set aside on the ground that the matter in dispute was moveable property, which could not be made the subject of proceedings under Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The learned District Magistrate in showing cause has invited our attention to Sub-section (2) of Section 145, which provides that "for the purposes of this section the expression 'land or water' includes buildings, markets, fisheries, crops or other produce of land and the rents or profits of any such property." We think it is dear that the learned Magistrate has mistaken the meaning of Sub-section (2). Chapter XII, in which Section 145 occurs, is headed "Disputes as to immoveable property," and we think it is clear that by "crops and other produce of land "in Sub-section (2) are intended to be meant crops or other produce of land attached to the land and not crops which have been severed, as in the present case. The learned Counsel, who appeared on the opposite side, does not contend that the provisions of Section 145 can properly be applied to such properties. 2. It follows that the order which has been made by the Deputy Magistrate in the present case attaching the cut crops, which were the subject-matter of dispute between the parties, cannot stand. The Rule is accordingly made absolute and the order is set aside.