JUDGMENT 1. The sole question in this second appeal relates to the construction of the terms of a Bale certificate under which the Defendant purchased two jotes in execution of decrees obtained by the Plaintiff (landlord). The sale certificates are in the same terms as the sale notification and other processes on the subject which were issued by the Court and after describing the particular jotes--and It is necessary in this respect to give only one for the purposes of this appeal--it describes the area and adds "annual jama Rs. 81-2-3 less bhadrasun Rs. 15-3, the remainder Rs. 65-3-3 1/3 is the rent at which the jote is in the possession of the judgment-debtors." Now, it has been found by both the lower Courts that these words mean that the auction-purchaser was liable for the full amount of rent stated therein and that any deduction on account of the bhadhrasun specified therein was a personal concession which might or might not be granted by the landlord at his will and pleasure. We are altogether unable to adopt this construction of the document. The object of a sale notification is to make known to intending purchasers the rent for which they would be liable if they bought the property under sale and it is impossible to understand the introduction of the word bhadrasun in such a document and a deduction of a certain sum of rent on this account unless it were for the purpose of reducing the gross rent in the manner as stated in the calculation so as to exhibit in the balance the amount which would be payable by the purchaser. As has been already, stated, the terms of only one of the sale notifications and sale certificates have been here given but the other are expressed in the same manner. We think, therefore, that the appeal must be decreed and the Defendant declared liable only for the lower amount that is the balance after this deduction stated in the sale certificate. The Appellant will receive his full costs in this Court and proportionate cost in the Courts below.