JUDGMENT 1. We are of opinion that the Malayalam words mentioned in the order of reference do not impose on a jenmi the obligation of proving "some special exigency" as a condition precedent to his right to recover " on demand" before twelve years. 2. We think S.A. No. 1665 of 1898 was rightly decided and we dissent from the decision in Mahomed v. Ali Koya I.L.R. 14 M 76 that "special exigency" must be proved.