JUDGMENT : Stanley, J.:— There was no justification whatever for the passing of the order of the learned Subordinate Judge of Aligarh, restraining the defendants appellants from receiving the rents of or interfering with the management of the land in dispute. The case neither falls within the provisions of section 492 nor within the provisions of section 493. Manifest harm might result if a person in receipt of the rent and profits of land were arbitrarily prohibited by the Court from collecting the rents. 2. In such a case the rents would in the ordinary course, fall into arrears with the probable result that when payment of them is afterwards applied for, it would be found that the tenants bad already expended them. If the plaintiffs be apprehensive that injury will result from allowing the defendants to collect the rents of the holding their obvious course is to apply for the appointment of a receiver. The appeal is allowed and the order of the learned Subordinate Judge is set aside with costs, and the injunction dissolved: We may observe that when a temporary injunction is granted pending the determination of a suit, it is usual to put the applicant under terms to abide by such order as the Court shall think fit to make by way of damages resulting from the passing of such order.