Research › Browse › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

1905 DIGILAW 152 (CAL)

Akhil Chandra Mandal v. Surendra Nath Dutt

1905-07-24

FRANCIS W.MACLEAN, PRATT

body1905
JUDGMENT Francis Maclean, C.J. - I see no reason to differ from the learned Judge as to the construction of the pottah of 1877. I think that, in the circumstances, he was quite right in remanding the case. It was not a remand merely upon the question of service of the notice but also upon its sufficiency. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Pratt J. 2. I agree.