JUDGMENT : Knox, J. The sole question which we have to decide in this second appeal is whether a person, who buys a plot of grove land in a village, becomes a co-sharer in the village so as to entitle him to enforce a right of pre-emption under the wajib-ul-arz, which confers such right upon co-sharers. The learned vakil for the appellant relied on the case of Dakhni Din v. Rahim-un-nissa, [1894] I.L.R., 16 All., 412. In that case the person, who sought to enforce the right of pre-emption had obtained certain plot of land belonging to the zamindar and in his occupation. 2. It was held that he thereby became a person responsible under section 146 of Act XIX of 1873 for the revenue for the time being assessed upon the mahal. This responsibility for the land revenue was insisted on in another case decided by this Court, Ali Hasain Khan v. Tasadduk Husain Khan, [1905] 2 A.L.J.R., 612. If we apply that test the present case the purchaser of a grove would not be a co-sharer inasmuch as he is not liable to payment of Government revenue. We think the Court below was right, and we dismiss this appeal with costs which wilt include fees oh the higher scale.