JUDGMENT : BLAIR, J.:— This appeal is governed by, the ruling, with which we entirely agree, in Manohar Khan v. Troyluckhonath Ghosh,. [1865] 4, W.R., 35., In that case it was held that where interveners claim a share of attached property, the court should define the respective shares of the debtor and the interveners, and sell the debtor's definite share only. 2. If the court omits to do so, and sells the undefined rights and interests, there is no decision under section 246 of Act VIII of 1859 and the one year's rule of limitation does not apply. In this case the court instead of finding that it was satisfied with the proof of possession either in the case of the interveners or in the case of the judgment-debtor, had ordered the sale of the property alleged to be of the judgment-debtor subject to the claim of the interveners. This case is manifestly on ail fours with the case in which the ruling referred to above was passed, This is sufficient in our opinion for the disposal of this appeal. It is dismissed with costs.