JUDGMENT : BANERJI, J. 1. This is an application for the revision of an order passed by the Subordinate Judge of Farrukhabad, for a rateable distribution of assets realised in execution of a decree, under the provisions of section 295 of the Code of Civil Procedure. A preliminary objection has been taken to the hearing of this application upon two grounds. Firstly, that the Court acted within its jurisdiction in making the order complained of, and consequently no application lies for revision under section 622 of the Code, and secondly, that as another remedy is open to the appellant, namely, a suit, under the last paragraph but one of section 295, this Court should not exercise its powers of revision. 2. In my judgment the preliminary objection must prevail. The Court had jurisdiction to make a rateable distribution. If in the exercise of that jurisdiction it has committed an error, that is no ground for revision under section 622 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This has been held by the Privy Council in Amir Hassan Khan v. Sheo Baksh Singh, [1885] I.L.R., 11 Cal, 6 and in other cases which have followed that ruling. It has also been held by this Court in numerous cases of which 1 may refer to only two, viz., Guise v. Jaisraj, [1893] I.L.R., 15 All., 405 and Kalian v. Begam, [1898] A.W.N., 73 that the High Court's powers of revision should not be exercised when another remedy is open to the applicant. In this case a remedy by suit is given to the applicant under section 295. We therefore decline to interfere in this case and dismiss the application with costs. RICHARDS, J. I would like to add one word only to the judgment of Mr. Justice BANERJI in which I entirely concur. I do not think that the Court ought to lay down a definite rule that in no case in which there is another remedy open, no matter how inconvenient, will it interfere in revision. It seems to me that if it were shown that the other remedy were so inconvenient as to practically amount to no remedy, the Court ought in a proper case to give relief by way of revision.