Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1906 DIGILAW 18 (MAD)

Kasaram Rangiah v. Malla Chengama Naidu

1906-02-15

body1906
JUDGMENT 1. The document is a bond and not a promissory note. Venku v. Sitaram I.L.R(1904) B. 82 It consequently can be admitted in evidence on payment of penalty and stamp duty under Section 35(a) of the Stamp Act of some kind whether skilled or unskilled.