Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1906 DIGILAW 19 (MAD)

Kararam Rangiah v. Malla Chengama Naidu

1906-02-15

MOORE, SUBRAHMANIA AYYAR

body1906
JUDGMENT 1. The document is a bond and not a promissory note. Venku v. Sitaram 29 B. 82 : 6 Bom. L.R. 841. It consequently can be admitted in evidence on payment of penalty and stamp duty under Section 35 (a) of the Stamp Act.