JUDGMENT : KNOX, J. This second appeal arises out of an application made by the appellants for a decree under section 90 of the Transfer of Property Act. The appellant had obtained a decree in a suit upon a mortgage bond, they brought the property to sale but the proceeds were insufficient to satisfy the amount due tinder the decree. The decision as to whether the appellants are entitled to a decree under section 90 depends upon this question, whether the balance claimed was legally recoverable on the date when the suit was brought (see I.L.R., 20 All., 368). That date was the 2nd November, 1903. In order to decide this question it must be seen which article of the Indian Limitation Act is applicable. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the appellants that the case falls within article 66 of the 2nd Schedule of the Indian Limitation Act. After consideration of the terms of the document we are of opinion that the document was a bond payable by instalments within article 75 of that Schedule. There is no evidence of any waiver. The first default was on the 7th December, 1895, consequently even if we applied six years' limitation the money was not on the date of suit recoverable otherwise than from the mortgaged property. The appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.