JUDGMENT : STANLEY, J. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant in this appeal is that where land-ordered by a Civil Court to-be sold is found to be comprised of not merely non-ancestral but also ancestral land, it is the duty of the Civil Court to transfer the execution of the decree not merely in respect of the ancestral land but in respect also of the non-ancestral property to the Collector. He relies upon the language of clause 1 of Notification No. 671, dated the 31st of August, 1880, as amended by subsequent notifications. This Notification was issued in pursuance of the power conferred by section 320 of the Code of Civil Procedure, upon the Local Government to declare that throughout the North-Western Provinces the execution of all decrees for the recovery of money in cases in which the Civil Court has ordered any ancestral land or interest in such land to be sold, shall be transferred to the Collector. Paragraph 1, which has been relied upon, runs in the following terms: “Every Civil Court on passing orders for the sale of any land in pursuance or execution of a decree shall ascertain from the judgment-debtor whether it is ancestral land as above defined, and after hearing any objection made by the decree-holder shall, if satisfied that the land or any portion of it is ancestral land, deal with the decree affecting it as directed in these rules.” We are asked to hold that under this provision where land directed to be sold comprises any ancestral land, the Court is bound to transfer the decree for execution in respect of all the property affected by the deeree to the Collector for execution. We think this is not the true meaning of the provision in question. The true interpretation of the rule is, as we think, that if the Civil Court is satisfied that the land, which is ordered to be sold or any portion of it is ancestral land, it shall deal with the decree affecting the land so far as it is ancestral land as directed in the rules, that is, it shall transfer the decree for execution to the Collector so far as regards ancestral land only. We, therefore, think that there is no substance in this appeal and dismiss it with costs, including fees in this Court on the higher scale.