Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1908 DIGILAW 66 (MAD)

Untitled judgment

1908-04-22

body1908
JUDGMENT 1. In this case the appellants have been convicted by a jury, but we must set aside the verdict as there has been a serious misdirection in the Judges charge to the jury. 2. The plea of all the accused was an alibi, and each of the accused, except the first, called witnesses to prove the alibi. Nine witnesses for the defence were examined, but the Sessions Judge in his charge to the jury has not referred to them at all; nor has he even stated what the plea of the accused was. It is impossible to say that this is not a misdirection which prejudiced the accused. 3. We set aside the conviction and direct that the accused be retried in accordance with law.