Damara Kumara Thimmia Nayamni Bahadur Varu v. Pullama Naidu
1909-10-12
ABDUR RAHIM, MUNRO
body1909
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT 1. The Subordinate Judge finds that the season was middling "one and that the defendants are entitled to partial remission. Exhibit A, however, makes no provision for remission in middling years," but only for remission in, case of excess or failure of rains, and clearly abnormal seasons were alone contemplated. We modify the decree of the Subordinate Judge by restoring the decree of the District Munsif with costs in this and the lower appellate Court.