Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1909 DIGILAW 300 (MAD)

Untitled judgment

1909-10-17

MILLER

body1909
ORDER Miller, J. 1. I am unable to find any authority to support the Magistratess view that a man may be required without fresh proceedings taken against him to find sureties a second time when in consequence of a breach, his original security is forfeited. The forfeiture of the security is prescribed as penalty for breach of the conditions of the bond and the Code does not provide for a renewal of the bond without fresh proceedings. The order is, therefore, set aside and the bail may be discharged.