JUDGMENT Miller, J. 1. I donot think the defence was barred. In the former suit the defendant was not allowed to deny the plaintiffs title but it was not found that the plaintiff had any title. 2. In the present suit the District Munsif finds that the defendant is no longer the plaintiffs tenant and the question of estoppel does not seem to arise. I must hold that the defence on title was not barred, and reversing the decree, remand the suit for disposal on the merits according to law. The costs of this petition will abide the event.