ORDER 1. The District Munsif states that the mulgar and the mulgenidar are jointly entered in the register as patttadars. The District Judge says that the mulgar is the pattadar and this seams to be supported by exhibit D. It is strongly contended before us that the mulgenidar alone is the pattadar, and the patta exhibit B as translated to us, seems to bear this interpretation. We must ask the District Judge to enquire and report who is, in fact, the registered pattadar, 2. Fresh evidence may, if necessary, be taken on both sides on this question. The report should be submitted within one month and seven days will be allowed for filing objections. 3. In compliance with the above order, the District Judge of South Canara submitted the following 4. Report.--Plaintiff, mulgar, sued his mulgeni tenant to make the latter pay the enhanced revenue on the holding. He failed both originally and on appeal.