Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1910 DIGILAW 359 (MAD)

Umade Rajaha Raje Damara Kumara Thimmanayannu Bahadur Varu v. Sri Ranga Bhupala Bali Row Garu

1910-07-22

KRISHNASWAMI AIYAR, WALLIS

body1910
JUDGMENT 1. We do not find it necessary to consider the point dealt with in the lower Court, but think it clear that Section 325 A of the Code of Civil Procedure which is made applicable by Section 47 of the Madras Court of Wards Act, 1902, is sufficient to save limitation. Section 825 A expressly excludes ,from calculation the period during which the decree is before the Collector for execution and the exclusion is obviously made applicable to proceedings for execution in the Civil Court. 2. There is nothing in the language of Section 47 of the Court of Wards Act to support the competition plot the last clause of Section 325A of the Code of Civil Procedure is one made applicable and it would be contrary to the manifest intention of the legislature so to hold. 3. The conclusion is right and the appeal is dismissed with costs.