Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1912 DIGILAW 110 (MAD)

In Re: Mallipaddi Gopaya v. Unknown

1912-03-01

AYLING, S.NAIR

body1912
ORDER 1. We have considered the decisions reported in Jogendra Nath Mukerjee v. Sarat Chandra Benerjee 32 C. 351 : 9 C.W.N. 277 : 2 Cr. L.J. 78 and Kali Kinkar Sett v. Nritya Gopal Roy 12 M. 47, but we are not prepared to differ from the view taken by this Court in Thathayya, In re 27 M. 124 : 1 Cr. L.J. 422. We do not consider that it makes any difference whether the sanction is accorded to a particular person or is couched in general terms. 2. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate will restore the case to his file and dispose of it according to law.