JUDGMENT 1. The managers of the five ginning firms came to an agreement, whereby they fixed the rates to be charged for ginning and baling cotton, thus forming a combination, and agreed that for a certain definite period, the profits of ginning would be 7 annas 6 pies and of baling one anna 6 pies per maund. They further agreed that the profits were to be divided, and that those for baling were to be divided equally, while those for ginning were to be divided in proportion to the ginning capacity of the various factories A dispute as to the ginning capacity of factories arose and suit instituted for share profits according ginning capacity their mills. The of first instance decreed claim. On appeal, decree slightly modified lower Appellate as amount which plaintiffs were entitled. In second appeal this Court, only point pressed before us is that agreement relied on was contrary to public policy and void in law. There are two cases decided by the Bombay High Court Haribhai Maneklal v. Sharaf Ali Isabji 22 B. 861 and Fraser & Co. v. The Bombay Ice Manufacturing Co. 29 B. 107 : L.R 7 Bom.. 107 which show that such a contract is neither in restraint of trade nor opposed to public policy. We agree with these rulings. The appeal, therefore, fails and is dismissed with costs.