Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1912 DIGILAW 566 (MAD)

In Re: Narayana Padayachi v. Unknown

1912-10-18

NAPIER

body1912
ORDER Napier, J. 1. The accused in this case was charged with an offence under Section 26 of Act V of 1882. This offence is compoundable under Section 55 of the Act. It is admitted that the accused has paid Rs. 2 by way of compensation to the village monegar for the Forest authorities. 2. Section 53 provides that on such payment no further proceedings shall be taken against such person. This section must mean that proceedings in progress must lapse. That being so the Magistrate had no jurisdiction to convict the accused. I set aside the conviction and order the fine to be refunded.