JUDGMENT : TUDBALL, J. This is an appeal from an order of remand. A preliminary objection is taken that no appeal lies. The appellants are the plaintiffs. They brought a suit in the court of the Munsif, valuing it at Rs. 156-6-0 and they claimed a half share in certain crops grown on certain land, or in lieu thereof, a sum of Rs. 156-6-0. On this amount they paid court-fees. Their case was that one Musammat Sonpati jointly cultivated this land with the other defendant, that she was the owner of half the crops and that she had sold them to the plaintiffs. They asked the court to declare that she had so done and they were entitled to recover the crops or their value. The suit is clearly a suit to recover moveable property of the value of Rs. 156-6-0 or their value. The suit is of a Small Cause Court nature and there can be no second appeal from the decree of the appellate court. Under Order 43, rule I, clause (a), an appeal against an order under Order 41, rule 23, would lie if an appeal would lie from the decree of the appellate court. Therefore no appeal lies in the present case. We allow the preliminary objection and dismiss the appeal with costs.