JUDGMENT Carnduff, J. - This is an Appeal against an order made by the District Judge of Dacca under Or. XXXIX, r. 2, sub-r. (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for the attachment of the Appellant's property and his imprisonment for six months as the penalty for his having disobeyed a temporary injunction issued in a suit brought against him. The order for the temporary injunction was passed by the Munsif of Dacca, and, after it had been passed, the suit was, for some reason or other, transferred to the file of the District Judge. The disobedience complained of admittedly occurred after the transfer. 2. The first point taken on behalf of the Appellant is that the District Judge's order was without jurisdiction, and I am of opinion that the objection must prevail. 3. R. 2, sub-r. (1) gives a Court power to issue a temporary injunction at any time after the commencement of a suit and sub-r. (3) then enacts that, in case of disobedience or breach, "the Court granting an injunction" may punish the contempt. These words, which are much more explicit than those used in the third paragraph of the corresponding sec. 493 of the Code of 1882, seem to me to be perfectly clear and unequivocal, and I can find nothing either in sec. 24 of the present Code, which provides for the transfer or withdrawal of cases by a District Judge, or in Chap. IV of the Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887, which contains some further provisions on the same subject, to authorise, expressly or by necessary implication, the District Judge, who had not granted this injunction, to exercise the special jurisdiction conferred on the Court that granted it, merely because the suit in which it had been granted, had been transferred to his file. On this ground alone, the Appeal must, I think, succeed : but I would make no order as to costs. Richardson, J. I agree.