JUDGMENT : 1. It is against the practice of this Court to interfere in revision with orders of acquittal. I may refer to the cases reported as In the matter of Sheikh Aminuddin, [1902] 24 All. 356 : (1902) A.W.N. 89 and Emperor v. Madar Bakhsh, [1903] 25 All. 128 : (1902) A.W.N. 200. 2. In both these cases the reference was made by the District Magistrate. I may refer also to Cl. 5, Section 439 of the Cr PC. Of course the right of appeal is vested in the Local Government and not in the District Magistrate but it is always open to the District Magistrate to move the Local Government to file an appeal. 3. I think it would amount to something very like an evasion of the provisions of the section above referred to if this Court were to make it a practice to entertain applications in revision like the present. Let the record be returned.