Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1915 DIGILAW 597 (MAD)

Gopisetti Narayanaswami Naidu v. Muthyala Venkatratnam,

1915-11-11

PHILLIPS

body1915
JUDGMENT Phillips, J. 1. It has been held by this Court in Narayanaswami Naidu v. Gantayya 32 Ind. Cas. 691; (1915) M.W.N. 865 and Ramanadan Chetti v. Periatambi Shervai 6 M. 250 that an execution petition returned for amendment but not re-presented, is an application which will give a fresh starting point for limitation. The present execution petition is, therefore, not barred by limitation and must be restored to file and disposed of in accordance with law.