Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

1916 DIGILAW 34 (SC)

Attorney-General for the State of Queensland (at the relation of Gols-brough, Mort and Co. (Limited) and others v. Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia, and Another

1916-06-02

body1916
The Lord Chancellor :- Their Lordships recognised that this case raised questions of unusual importance, and accordingly they departed from their usual practice, and, in hearing this application, invited a somewhat full argument on the merits of the appeal. They have given careful consideration to all the points raised, and the reasons that were urged in support of the application, but they find themselves unable to advise His Majesty that special leave to appeal should be granted. The petition will be dismissed with costs. Leave refused.