Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1918 DIGILAW 235 (MAD)

Ambalam Ibrahi v. Emperor

1918-08-20

NAPIER, S.AIYAR

body1918
ORDER 1. This must be taken as a petition of revision directed solely against the order of the Tahsildar Magistrate refusing to give a copy of the Magistrates judgment, the refusal having been baaed on the ground that the petitioner ought to pay eight-annas search fees along with his application for copy under the Boards Standing Order No. ) 173. 2. The application for copy was made to the officer as a Magistrate (a Criminal Court) by an accused convicted by him and the Boards Standing Order has absolutely no relevancy to such an application. An application of that kind is governed by Rule 188 of the Criminal Rules of Practice framed by the High Court under the powers vested in the High Court by Section 554 Sub-section (2), Clause (c) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 3. The Magistrate is, therefore, directed to give the copy applied for without further delay.