JUDGMENT 1. This appeal arises out of a suit for rent. It was decreed by the first Court, but dismissed by the lower Appellate Court on the ground that the plaintiff, who was one of the four administrators to the estate of Moulvi Khabiruddin, could not maintain the suit in the absence of the other three persons who joined him in taking out the Letters of Administration. In our opinion, any defect which could have arisen from the absence of the other three persons was cured by making them pro forma defendants and by their giving consent in their capacity as pro forma defendants to the plaintiff continuing the suit. 2. We accordingly reverse the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate Court and remand the case for a decision on the second issue that arose before the lower Appellate Court as to the amount of rent payable by defendant No. 1. After hearing the case on this point, the lower Appellate Court will finally dispose of the appeal according to law. Costs of this appeal will abide the result. 3. As we have held that the appeal lies in this case, the connected Rule is discharged as being unnecessary.