Research › Browse › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

1922 DIGILAW 504 (CAL)

Hamid Ali v. Srikissen Gossain

1922-12-11

B.B.GHOSE, CUMING

body1922
JUDGMENT 1. We have no alternative but to accept this reference in view of the recent rulings of this Court. 2. The finding and sentence must, therefore, be set aside and the trial resumed from the point where the Court examined the accused persons after the examination of the prosecution witness s concluded. We would impress on the learned Magistrate the necessity for a strict observation of the provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure and where the terms of the Code are perfectly clear there is no excuse whatever for a deliberate disregard of them.