Research › Browse › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

1924 DIGILAW 634 (CAL)

Krishna Mohan Ghosh v. Surapati Banerjee

1924-11-24

body1924
JUDGMENT 1. We think that under the circumstance of the case the delay was bona fide and sufficient cause has been shown within the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. 2. We accordingly make the Rule absolute. Costs one gold mohur will be costs in the cause.