Research › Browse › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

1931 DIGILAW 73 (CAL)

Radharaman Saha v. Emperor

1931-03-02

CUMING

body1931
JUDGMENT Cuming, J. - The facts of the case will appear from the judgment of the learned Magistrate. The petitioner has been convicted u/s 157, I. P.C. 2. The case is briefly that on a certain day two persons who are what are described as volunteers came to the house of the petitioner and he gave them food. 3. The Magistrate finds that by so doing he harboured these persons and that he was aware that these two had formed or were likely to have formed an unlawful assembly the common object of which was the commission of an offence punishable u/s 4 of the Ordinance of 1930. On the findings of the learned Magistrate no offence u/s 157 has been committed. 4. The Magistrate finds that the petitioner was aware that in some past time the two volunteers had formed or were likely to have formed an unlawful assembly. 5. Section 157, I. P.C. clearly refers to some unlawful assembly in the future It provides for an occurrence which may happen not which has happened. The findings of the learned Magistrate do not justify a conviction u/s 157. 6. The conviction and sentence must therefore be set aside and the petitioner acquitted. The fine if paid must be refunded.