Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1939 DIGILAW 395 (MAD)

Untitled judgment

1939-11-16

LAKSHMANA RAO

body1939
ORDER Lakshmana Rao, J. 1. The signature of the petitioner; in the forwarding note does not necessarily prove that he was in possession of the goods and his conviction under Section 486, I.P.C., cannot be sustained. It is therefore set aside and the fine if levied will be refunded.