JUDGMENT Henderson, J. - This appeal is by the judgment-debtor. The decree under execution was passed in an Union Court on 27th January 1941. The respondent is an assignee of the original decree-holder. The notice required by O. 21, R. 16, Civil P. C., was given by the Munsif in the course of the present execution proceeding. The contention of the appellant is that this notice ought to have been given by the Court which passed the decree; as this was not done the sale held in the course of the execution was a nullity. Mr. Janah pointed out that this appeal is barred under S. 102, Civil P. C. It will, therefore, be necessary to consider it on the original application filed in revision. Under S. 93 (1), Bengal Village Self-Government Act, the CPC does not apply to proceedings before Union Courts. It, therefore, seems very doubtful whether the assignee of a decree can execute it in the Union Court at all. At any rate if the present objection is a good one and the sale is a nullity, it will be impossible for the respondent to take any further proceeding in execution. Now in no sense of the term can it be said that the Union Court is a transferor Court and the Munsif a transferee Court. Under S. 91, Bengal Village Self-Government Act, the Munsif has an independent jurisdiction to execute the decree provided that the conditions imposed by sub-s. (2) are complied with. Under sub-s. (3) he shall have the same power as if he were executing a decree passed by himself. Hence the Munsif had jurisdiction to issue a notice under O. 21, R. 16, Civil P. C., and in so doing he followed the proper procedure. The appeal is dismissed. I make no order as to costs. The appellant may withdraw the money which she deposited as a condition precedent to the issuing of the rule.