This purports to be an appeal under the provisions of S. 417, Criminal P. C. The material facts briefly are as follows : The accused Mahendra Chandra De is the station master of Plaibargaon Railway station of the Assam Railway. A police officer submitted a report against him to the effect that be had demanded a bribe of Rs. 50 from one Sudhir Pandit for arranging for a wagon for the said Sudhir Pandit. On this report, process was issued against the accused and he was placed on his trial before a Magistrate of the First Class at Nowgong. The learned Magistrate recorded evi­dence and then delivered a judgment in which he held first-that under the provisions of S. 6, Prevention of Corruption Act 1947, the Court was not entitled to take cognizance of the offence without sanction and that no sanction had been ac­corded to the prosecution and therefore, the Magis­trate had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offence. But he proceeded to hold from the facts and circumstances that the prosecution case had not been made out; and he ordered that the accused be acquitted under S. 258, Criminal P. C. [2] The Local Government has moved this Court. [3] Under S. 6, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, it is clear that the sanction of some autho­rity was necessary before the Court could take cognizance of the offence, and it is conceded that no such sanction was accorded in the present case. It seems to us clear, therefore, that under 8. 530 (p), Criminal P. C,, the proceedings before the Magistrate were void and the order of acquittal a nullity. [4] In this view, it was unnecessary on the part of the Crown to move this Court. v. B.B. Order accordingly.