1. This restoration application has been filed by Salga against my order of the 30th October, 1950, whereby I dismissed for default his application under sec. 10 (2) of the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, No. IX of 1949, against an order of the Assistant Collector, Amber. The restoration application was filed on 14.11.1950 on the ground that on the date fixed for the hearing of his revision application he was ill. A medical certificate has been filed in support of this Statement. 2. Counsel for Sadhu contends that inasmuch as there is no provision in the Ordinance for a restoration application, this restoration application is not maintainable. This argument is untenable. As I have pointed out on several occasions in the past, the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, is not a self-contained law and re-course is to be taken to the provisions of the ordinary law on many points. Moreover, the powers given to the Board under sec. 10 (i) of the Ordinance are very wide and the Board can interfere even without an application, on their own motion. I, therefore, allow the restoration application subject to the payment of Rs. 15/- as cost to Sadhu and cancel my order of 30.12.1950 and restore the case to its original number.