Judgment :- 1. The question that arises for decision is whether the petitioner is entitled to practice in the subordinate courts of this State by virtue of his enrolment as an Advocate of the High Court of Bombay. 2. The Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (Central Act XXXVIII of 1926) and the Legal Practitioners' Act, 1879 (Central Act XVIII of 1879), are now in force in Travancore-Cochin. As held in A.I.R. 1945 Madras 144 and A.I.R. 1946 Patna 369 the latter enactment will not in any way affect the question before us and in the light of those decisions the petitioner's prayer has to be allowed. 3. The only doubt that we had was whether Section 8 of the Cochin Vakils' Act, VI of 1095, will complicate the issue. We have however come to the conclusion that by virtue of Section 6 of the Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951 (Central Act III of 1951) the Cochin Vakils' Act, VI of 1095, has ceased to be operative from the date on which the whole of the Legal Practitioner's Act, 1879 (Central Act XVIII of 1879), was brought into force in the State, namely, from 13-10-1952. (Vide Notification No. C. J. 4-21613/52/CS., Travancore-Cochin Government Gazette dated the 21st October 1952, Part I, page 1175). 4. The Petition is allowed. Allowed.