Judgment :- 1. The only question involved in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is whether the distance between the Pankajam Theatre and the Radhakrishna Talkies within the Alwaye Municipality is less than a mile or not. If the distance is a mile or over the appellants must certainly fail and no other question will arise for consideration. 2. The distance for the purposes of this case has to be measured not in a straight line on a horizontal plane as provided in section 10 of the Travancore-Cochin Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 112 5 (Act VII of 1125) but according to the rule reproduced below: "Section [ii-A] -"Restrictions regarding the distance between cinema installations, 1. [1] There shall be a distance of at least; [i] one mile in Municipal areas; and [ii] two miles in non-Municipal areas between any two cinema installations: Provided that this restriction shall not apply in the case of two permanent cinema installations. 2. Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules no license shall be issued or renewed in respect of a cinema installation which does not satisfy the condition laid down in Sub-rule [i]. 3. For purposes of Sub-rule [i] he distance between cinema installations will be reckoned by the shortest route along public read or public lane connecting the installations." [Travancore-Cochin Government Gazette Extraordinary dated the 30th November 1952, page 2]. 3. Exhibit IX is a plan prepared by the Municipality which is admitted to be correct by all the parties before us and has been marked with their consent. 4. It is clear from Exhibit IX that there are four routes and that routes I and IV marked therein exceed a mile in length. Routes II and III are both less than a mile in length but are essentially amphibian in character. It is impossible to consider them as routes along a public road or a public line which is what is necessary under sub-rule (3) of Rule 1. 5. The word "Road" according to Webster applies generally to highways, and as a generic term includes highways, streets and lines. 6. It is impossible to consider them as routes along a public road or a public line which is what is necessary under sub-rule (3) of Rule 1. 5. The word "Road" according to Webster applies generally to highways, and as a generic term includes highways, streets and lines. 6. Any person following route II will have to traverse a stretch of water 350 feet in length (the distance between K and L) and any one following route III will have to traverse a stretch of water 280 feet in length (the distance between N and O), both stretches being parts of the Alwaye river. 7. It follows that only routes I and IV need be considered and that this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has to be dismissed. 8. In the circumstances of the case we shall make no order as to costs. Dismissed