Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1954 DIGILAW 209 (MAD)

Untitled judgment

1954-04-29

SOMASUNDARAM

body1954
Order.- The petitioners have all been convicted under section 9 of the Madras Gaming Act for having been found playing in a common gaming house. As a result of the warrant obtained the Sub-Inspector of Police P.W.1 raided the house and found the petitioners herein playing cards with money. The card packets, loose cards, two containers of the cards and one of them having Rs.0-9-0 were seized. The question is whether on the presumption raised under section 6 the petitioners could be convicted without any additional piece of evidence. Section 6 says: “Any cards, dice, gaming table or cloth, board or other instruments of gaming found in any place entered or searched under the provisions of the last preceding section, or on any person found therein shall be evidence that such place is used as a common gaming-house and that the persons found therein were there present for the purpose of gaming, although no play was actually seen by the Police Officer or any of his assistants.” When the section says “any cards, etc., shall be evidence”, the question is whether that evidence by itself is sufficient or whether any additional piece of evidence is necessary for the purpose of conviction. As pointed out by Horwill, J., in Kulandaivelu Chettiar, In re1, though there is nothing in the Act which prevents a Magistrate from convicting upon that evidence alone, still in almost every case there is some other evidence also. In short, though the section does not in terms prohibit the conviction merely on the presumption raised under section 6, still invariably it has been the practice prevailing in this Court not to convict on mere evidence alone unless there is something more in addition to the presumption raised under that section. There is no such additional evidence in this case. The case rests merely on the presumption raised under section 6. In these circumstances, the convictions of the petitioners under section 9 cannot stand and therefore the convictions are set aside. The fines, if paid, will be refunded. K.C. ----- Convictions set aside.