Research › Browse › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1958 DIGILAW 51 (MAD)

Untitled judgment

1958-02-10

P.RAJAGOPALAN, RAMACHANDRA.IYER

body1958
Rajagopalan, O.C.J.-We agree with the office that clause 15 of the Letters Patent does apply The application to amend the decree in the Second Appeal certainly invoked the civil appellate jurisdiciton vested in this Court. If so leave of the learned Judge who dismissed the application to amend the decree was necessary under rule 95 of the Appellate Side Rules read with clause 15 of the Letters Patent. No such leave was asked for or obtained. The appeal is incompetent. V.S. ----- Office note accepted.