ORDER :- The main point argued in this revision application is that two persons, viz., the driver of a motor-car and the driver of a motor-truck coming from different directions collided and they were tried in one trial for offences under Ss. 279 and 304-A I.P.C. and therefore the trial is bad. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is correct in view of the provisions of S. 239 Cr. P. C. In such a case it cannot be said that there is one transaction in which different offences have been committed. The conviction and sentence of the petitioner are, therefore, set aside and a re-trial is ordered. Order accordingly.