Research › Browse › Judgment

Karnataka High Court · body

1962 DIGILAW 44 (KAR)

P. R. GOPALAKRISHNA BANNINATHAYA v. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, MYSORE

1962-03-25

AHMED ALI KHAN, K.S.HEGDE

body1962
( 1 ) THE orders of assessment which are impeached in this writ petition are clearly invalid orders. They relate to assessment years 1957-58, 1958-59, 1959-60 and 1960-61. Admittedly, in none of these years the petitioner's net agricultural income was more than Rs. 7,000. In the family of the petitioner there are more than five members. The assessing authority was wrong in thinking that the mother and wife of the petitioner are not members of his family. Under Part I of the Schedule annexed to the Mysore Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1957, it is provided that the limit referred to shall be seven thousand rupees in the case of every Hindu undivided family or an Aliyasanthana family or branch or a Marumakkathayam tarwad or tavazhi including a Nambudiri family or any other class governed by the law applicable to Nambudiris, which satisfies as at the end of the previous year the condition that it consists of at least five members. The assessing authority wrongly proceeded on the basis that the female members of the family are not members of the petitioner's family; quite clearly in the family of the petitioner there are more than five members. Therefore, the petitioner is not liable to pay any tax. Hence the levy made on him is an illegal levy. ( 2 ) FOR the reasons mentioned above, the tax levied on the petitioner on his agricultural income above mentioned being illegal, the same is quashed. No costs.