( 1 ) THE question in these two masters is as to the correct mode of computation of Court fee, payable on the memorandum of appeal. The appeals have been presented against awards made by the Arbitrator functioning under the Requisitioning and Acquisitioning of Immoveable property Act claiming that higher compensation than what has been awarded by him should have been awarded to the appellants. ( 2 ) THE appellants contend that only fixed Court fee is payable under Clause (iii) of Art. 3 of Sch. II of the Mysore Court Fees and Suits valuation Act, 1958. ( 3 ) THE matter is governed by S. 48 of the said Act according to which the Court fee payable on a memorandum of appeal against any decision, award or order relating to compensation under any Act for the time being in force for acquisition of property for public purpose shall be computed on the difference between the amount awarded by the arbitrator and the amount claimed by the appellant. ( 4 ) THE argument suggested on behalf of the appellants might perhaps have keen possible,-though we have serious doubts even in that regard,-if the adjudication appealed from had been described only by the word 'order' in the said Section. But by an amendment carried by the mysore Act 111 of 1969, the words 'decision, award or order' were substituted for the word 'order' appearing in the original unamended S. 48. ( 5 ) THE language of the Section as now amended leaves no room for any doubt whatever that the Court fee should be paid on the memorandum of appeal in each of these cases on the difference between the amount awarded by the Arbitrator and the amount claimed by the appellant in der Article 1 of Schedule I of the Act. ( 6 ) TIME for payment of difference of Court fee: four weeks in each of these cases. --- *** --- .