Judgement GOSWAMI, J.:- This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court whereby the Andhra Pradesh Tyres and Tubes Dealers Licensing Order 1973 (briefly the Licensing Order) was struck down as illegal and ultra vires. 2. A few facts which are material may first be noted. 3. By Notification S. O. 1844 dated June18, 1966. the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (briefly the Act) directed "that the powers conferred on it by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act .to make orders to provide -for the matters specified in clauses (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i). (ii) and (j) of sub-section (2) thereof shall in relation to all commodities other than foodstuffs and fertilisers (whether inorganic, organic or mixed), be exercisable also by a State Government, or, in relation to. a Union territory, by the administrator thereof, subject to the following conditions......" x x x x x 4. Section 2 (a) of the Act defines "essential commodity" which means ten specified commodities and the residuary clause (xi) thereof refers to------- "any other class of commodity which the Central Government may, by notified order, declare to be an essential commodity for the purposes of this Act being a commodity with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws by virtue of entry 33 in List III in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution". 5. Tyres and tubes are not included in the specified commodities in Section 2 (a).. However, the Central Government by three notified orders, namely,S.O. No. 2511 dated August 17, 1966, S. O. No. 2878 of August 22, 1968 and S. O. No. 85 dated. January 3, 1969, declared cycle tyres and tubes, car and tractor tyres and tubes and tubes and tyres of buses, vans, trucks. etc. as essential commodities under Section 2 (a) (xi). 6. The impugned Licensing Order was passed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh on June 18, 1973 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 3 Of the Act read with S. O. No, 1844 dated June 18. 1966 and with the prior concurrence of the Central Government. etc. as essential commodities under Section 2 (a) (xi). 6. The impugned Licensing Order was passed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh on June 18, 1973 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 3 Of the Act read with S. O. No, 1844 dated June 18. 1966 and with the prior concurrence of the Central Government. The respondents, who were dealers in tyres and tubes of buses, trucks, jeeps, cars -and other auto-vehicles, challenged the validity of the Licensing Order on the ground that the, State Government had no power to issue the same with regard to tyres and tubes which were declared by the Central Government to be essential commodities subsequent to,the delegation of powers to the State Government under Section 5 which had been made earlier on June 18, 1966. Their contention was accepted by the High Court and the Licensing Order was struck down. Hence this appeal by special leave at the instance of the State Government. 7. The short question that arises for consideration is whether the order of delegation of power by the Central Government under section 5 enabling the State Government to , make orders or issue notifications under S. 3 would empower the State Government to promulgate orders with regard to commodities which were declared to be essential commodities by the Central Government subsequent to the order of delegation. 8. Section 5 of the Act reads as follows:- "The Central Government may, by notified order, direct that the powers to make orders or issue notifications under S. 3 shall, in relation to such matters and subject to conditions, if any, as may be specified in the direction be exercisable also by (a) such officer or authority subordinate to the Central Government or (b) such State Government or authority subordinate to a State Government. as may be specified in the direction." 9. There is nothing in Section 5 to limit the power of delegation in favour of the State Government only to the commodities specified in Section 2 (a) or to those commodities declared essential under section 2 (a) (xi) upto the date of delegation. Delegation under Section 5 is a general delegation and will inure in favour of exercise of power by the ,State Government with respect to commodities. Delegation under Section 5 is a general delegation and will inure in favour of exercise of power by the ,State Government with respect to commodities. declared essential by the Central Government from time to time under section 2 (a) (xi) even subsequent to the order of delegation. It is not necessary that every time the Central Government declares an essential commodity it has also to pass an order of, delegation under Section 5 with regard to that commodity. Reading. Section 5 and Section 3 together there is no warrant for the view that the power of delegation is confined to essential commodities specified under the Act and such others as may be declared by the Central Goverment upto the order of delegation. Delegation of power to the State Government to act under, Section 3 is not restricted to any specified essential commodity as such. It will be sufficient in law if on the date the State Government, duly empowered under Section 5, makes a notification under Section 3 with regard to an essential commodity within the meaning of section 2 (a) including the residuary clause (xi) thereof. All that is required is that the commodity on the date of the order of the State Government, answers the description of the clauses in Section 2 (a) of the Act. The fact that a commodity is declared essential after the order of delegation does not affect the exercise of power by the State Government under Section 3 of the Act. The High Court is therefore not right in narrowly construing the order of delegation under Section 5 of the Act. The Licensing Order is, therefore, not valid on the ground that the tyre and tubes were declared to be essential commodities by the Central Government after the order of delegation under Section 5 of the Act. 10. In the result the appeal is allowed and the judgment of the High Court is set aside. There will be, however, no order as to costs. Appeal allowed. For Citation: AIR 1975 SC 2030