JUDGMENT M.P. Pandey, Member. - This is a revision against the order dated September 21, 1968 passed by Sri D.S. Verma, S.D.O., Bindki distt. Fatehpur in a proceedings for cancellation of Patta under Section 198(2) of Z.A. and L.R. Act, as it stood before 1970. 2. It appears that one Sri Pal was allotted plot No. 336 (0-15-0 Bigha) by means of a Patta from the Land Management Committee. Subsequently a report was made by the Tahsildar that the allotment procedure was not followed inasmuch as the land in dispute was not mentioned when the publicity for allotment was made. The trial court took the statements of the Lekhpal and the lessee and on the basis of the statement of the Lekhpal who said that the number of plot was not mentioned in the notice of publicity, he came to the conclusion that the proceedings were irregular and cancelled the allotment. 3. An appeal against that order was filed before the learned Addl. Commissioner who dismissed it and hence this revision. 4. I have heard learned counsels of both the parties. The Lekhpal has very categorically stated that the notice was pasted in the proceedings book and in that notice the disputed plot does not find place. This is an irregularity and may be said to be a material irregularity. It the number of plot is not mentioned, persons interested in that may not come forward to apply for allotment. It is just possible that a particular plot is situate near the plot of a landholder or is very convenient to a particular person. If he comes to know that plot is going to be allotted, he is bound to apply for it. So the mention of the plot in the notice is very necessary. It is for this purpose that Rule 173 says that the number of plot should be mentioned in the notice and if it is not mentioned, then it is a material irregularity. 5. In my opinion the allotment has rightly been cancelled. 6. In view of the above, the revision is dismissed.