Short Note : 1. Non-applicant No.1 Jagdish Chandra filed a suit against Laxmichand (Non-applicant No.2) for his eviction from the accommodation let out to him and for arrears of rent. Laxmichand had admitted his contract of tenancy with Jagdish Chandra. Applicant Gajadhar Prasad claiming to be a co-owner of the house along with Jagdish Chandra, wanted to be impleaded in the suit as a party. Jagdish Chandra being interested in denying Gajadhar Prasad's title, objected to the joinder. The trial Court had rejected Gajadhar Prasad's application and he had come up in revision. Held : The revision must fail. The order refusing to join him as a party is an interlocutory order not covered by the proviso (a) or (b) of section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Gajadhar Prasad has a remedy available. He can file a suit to establish his title against Jagdish Chandra and in the event Jagdish Chandra obtains possession from the tenant, sue him for joint or separate possession. The landlord after obtaining a decree cannot expect resistance by a co-owner. 1973 MPLJ Note 65 relied on. Ishaq Ahmad v. Ram Singh, 1976 MPLJ Note 481 distinguished. Revision dismissed.