Short Note : 1. This revision is directed against an order by which the lower Court refused to stay the suit for ejectment filed against the defendant-applicant pending disposal of an application for fixation of fair rent made before the Rent Controlling Authority. 2. The suit, in which this revision arises, was filed on 6th May 1976. The application for fixation of fair rent was made before the Rent Controlling Authority sometime in August 1976. The suit is based only on the ground of bona-fide need of the plaintiff. It is difficult to understand as to how the decision which the Rent Controlling Authority may give in the proceedings for fixation of fair rent will have any effect on the suit. The Rent Controlling Authority can fix fair rent only from the date of the application of from one month prior to the date of the application. There is, therefore, no possibility of there being any conflict even as regards arrears of rent which has been claimed in the suit. The lower Court was, therefore, right in refusing to stay the suit. 3. The learned counsel for the defendant-applicant submits that monthly rent is being deposited in Court under section 13 (1) of the Act during the pendency of the suit and if the plaintiffs are allowed to withdraw the amount difficulty may arise in the event of the fair rent being fixed by the Rent Controlling Authority at a lower rate. To meet this difficulty, the learned counsel for the plaintiffs-non applicants undertakes on their behalf that if the fair rent is fixed by the Rent Controlling Authority at a lower rate, the difference, if any, would be refunded to the defendant-applicant. In view of this undertaking, it is not necessary to stop the plaintiffs from withdrawing the monthly rent which is being deposited by the defendant during the pendency of the suit. Revision dismissed.