Short Note : 1. The material facts giving rise to this revision petition briefly are as follows. The applicant submitted an application for setting aside an ex-parte decree passed against him in a suit instituted by the non-applicant. The ground urged for setting aside the ex-parte decree was that the applicant was unable to attend the Court on account of his Illness, when the suit was called on for hearing. The trial Court after appreciating the evidence on record, held that the applicant had failed to make out that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from appearing in the Court when the suit was called on for hearing. In this view of the matter the application for setting aside the exparte decree was dismissed by the trial Court. Aggrieved by that order, the applicant preferred an appeal before the Additional District Judge. Mandsaur. The learned Additional District Judge analysed the entire evidence on record and found that the applicant had failed to prove that he was unable to attend the Court on the date fixed for hearing due to illness. In this view of the matter the lower appellate Court dismissed the appeal. The applicant has, therefore, preferred this revision petition. 2. Held : Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I have come to the conclusion that this revision petition deserves to be dismissed. The Courts, below have concurrently found that the applicant had failed to prove that he was prevented by illness from attending the Court on the date when the suit was called on for hearing. This is a finding of fact based on the evidence on record. The Court below had admittedly jurisdiction to give that finding. Learned counsel for the applicant has not been able to show that in arriving at that finding the Court below, has committed any illegality or material irregularity in the exercise of its jurisdiction. There is thus no ground for any interference u/s. 115 CPC. Revision dismissed.