Short Note : 1. The petitioner filed an appeal to the State Government. The Government thought that there was no merti in the petitioner's appeal and that the punishments awarded by the Director of Agriculture were too lenient having regard to the gravity of the charges. State Government, therefore, issued a notice for enhancement of the punishment under rule 29 of the Madhya pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966. The petitioner replied to the show cause notice issued by the Government. Thereupon, the papers were sent to the Public Service Commission for opinion. After receiving the opinion of the Public Service Commission, the State Government enhanced the punishment and dismissed the petitioner from service. The petitioner then filed the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing that order. Held : The only grievance raised by the petitioner before us is that there were certain irregularities in the departmental enquiry in that the petitioner was not given sufficient opportunity to produce documents and he was also not given sufficient opportunity to cross-examine certain witnesses. In our opinion, there is no merit in this argument. The petitioner has not filed his memo of appeal to show that any of these objections were taken when he went up in appeal to the State Government. The reply to the show cause notice issued by the State Government has also not been filed to show that these objections were taken before the State Government. In the circumstances, the petitioner cannot be allowed to take these objections in the writ petition. Petition dismissed.